Difference between revisions of "Document provenance of results by Suzanne Pierce"

Revision as of 10:33, 3 April 2015

Details on how to do this task: Document the provenance of the results

Selecting Data Sets for GPF and Tutorial:

Observations on making data public 1) challenge to select and assure that dataset is absolutely correct 2) takes time to document dataset, source and context to be sure it is a standalone object. 3) Coordination among team members is needed to be sure that all the pieces are uploaded 4) There has to be a clear plan and choices for what is necessary 5) bundling and project options on figshare should be useful (but I'm still trying to understand how they work) 6) the free level access on figshare is very good, but the file size limitations are an issue for many file sets (e.g. set of candidate solutions over 1GB limit) - re-structuring uploads and figshare units to accomodate. May need to subscribe to figshare at appropriate level (=long term cost to researcher to keep data up and available) 7) Already see benefits because we know exactly where a dataset is (one that we have to search for all the time) - now it has a persistent place (easy to find)

Tutorial Files, links, workflow

OSGeo4w [1]

Publishing/Sharing datasets

Citation: Pierce, Suzanne (2015): Gridded Shapefile for the Recharge Zones of the Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1330145 Retrieved 16:56, Mar 10, 2015 (GMT)

Workflow Sketch