Document provenance of results by Allen Pope - Revision history

Allen: Set PropertyValue: Progress = 100

2015-04-06T19:06:36Z

Set PropertyValue: Progress = 100

2015-04-06T19:06:27Z

2015-04-06T04:17:18Z

2015-03-12T23:56:28Z

2015-03-12T23:55:19Z

2015-03-12T19:21:48Z

2015-03-12T19:14:09Z

2015-03-12T18:29:39Z

2015-03-12T18:28:37Z

2015-03-12T17:39:18Z

Set PropertyValue: Progress = 90

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 	Expertise=Geosciences|
 	Owner=Allen_Pope|
-	Progress=90|
+	Progress=100|
 	StartDate=2015-03-07|
 	TargetDate=2015-03-20|
 	Type=Low}}

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 Will need to describe in text, too. Break down each sub-section of the workflow, and potentially sketch it out even more broadly at the time of writing.
 Potentially make more modular figures, too
 <!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line -->

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 It also made me realize my code is probably not terribly efficient. Something to work on better in the future, not necessarily now.
 I also realized that putting together this structure helped me change the way I think about blocks of code, etc - which will be helpful for sharing code later.
 Consider who did what - and it's a matter of scale (number of authors, processes, etc.)
-As a not-formally-trained coder, this made me realize more best practice in terms of creating code.
+As a not-formally-trained coder, this made me realize more best practice in terms of creating code. (see above)
-Will need to describe in text.
+One thing which isn't 100% reproducible is the figures. For the map - the GIS is not something I can code up.
-Potentially create sketch workflow.
+For the other plots, I provide a way to get to the point of the figure where possible - but I then have taken it through plot.ly and Illustrator to get to what is in the paper.
-Potentially make more modular figures...
+I would change how I did this - save the exact code that got me to a figure as much as possible. As well as share the plot.ly itself as an easier way to share things.
 <!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line -->

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 I looked through the workflow tools. They look good in theory, but with code already done, it was too much of a hassle. Also, not used by my community so not as helpful. MIght also be important that MATLAB is proprietary and didn't look like it was supported? Not sure about gdal.
 So, I have chosen to created a fairly detailed workflow diagram, instead (I chose to do this in Illustrator).
-[https://www.dropbox.com/s/9sq1qrwfbxuz7op/GPF_Workflow-01.jpg?dl=0]
+[https://www.dropbox.com/s/io0fl64y9f2ns5o/GPF_Workflow.ai?dl=0]
 This was a good exercise to align datasets and code. It made sure that I knew all the bits of code I needed (was good to do before sharing code - now that is ready to do, too) as well as all the data.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 I looked through the workflow tools. They look good in theory, but with code already done, it was too much of a hassle. Also, not used by my community so not as helpful. MIght also be important that MATLAB is proprietary and didn't look like it was supported? Not sure about gdal.
 So, I have chosen to created a fairly detailed workflow diagram, instead (I chose to do this in Illustrator).
 This was a good exercise to align datasets and code. It made sure that I knew all the bits of code I needed (was good to do before sharing code - now that is ready to do, too) as well as all the data.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 12 March 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:

	As a not-formally-trained coder, this made me realize more best practice in terms of creating code.		As a not-formally-trained coder, this made me realize more best practice in terms of creating code.
		+
		+	Will need to describe in text.
		+	Potentially create sketch workflow.
		+	Potentially make more modular figures...

	<!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line -->		<!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line -->