Difference between revisions of "Discuss what we will consider a GPF"
From Geoscience Paper of the Future
(→The Case of the Tuberculosis Drugome) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080278 a publication that reports on that work]. | * [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080278 a publication that reports on that work]. | ||
| + | = What is a Geoscience Paper of the Future = | ||
| + | |||
| + | A GPF paper includes: | ||
| + | * data: documented, in a public repository, and cited with DOIs | ||
| + | * software: documented, in a public repository, and cited with DOIs | ||
| + | * workflow is explicitly documented, possibly in a shared repository and given a DOI | ||
| + | * figures/visualizations are generated by explicit code and included in that workflow | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 6 February 2015
Executable Papers
Elsevier carried out an [ Executable Papers Challenge].
The Case of the Tuberculosis Drugome
This is a case where the workflow was made explicit and published as linked open data in RDF (i.e., accessible Web objects in the Semantic Web). The data were assigned DOIs, as was the workflow.
- the original "drugome" paper
- the web site that describes how that paper was reproduced
- detailed documentation of the drugome method
- a publication that reports on that work.
What is a Geoscience Paper of the Future
A GPF paper includes:
- data: documented, in a public repository, and cited with DOIs
- software: documented, in a public repository, and cited with DOIs
- workflow is explicitly documented, possibly in a shared repository and given a DOI
- figures/visualizations are generated by explicit code and included in that workflow
